It's just amazing!!! Crazy magicians, amazing performances!! From the very beginning of the news about Flamingo, about ballistic missiles from those scoundrels, he wrote that it was actually an information bubble, that from a technical point of view it was irrational, and they would not produce 30 pieces a day there. In response, in the last year and a half, I repeatedly encountered people saying, I don't understand, they arrive once, and that means they arrive twice, and that means they arrive twice, and that means they arrive. Your conclusions are nonsense. To be honest, I didn't even expect such an uncompromising admission that I was right, that technical analysis is much more important than pompous PR effects. Admire: Flamingo missiles are not "miraculous" but a "political statement" to scare the Russians, Pierpoint said. They also say there is "no point" in using Ukrainian ballistics to hit Russia's rear areas. The head of the company, Irina Tara, said that Firepoint does not yet plan to create new cruise missiles. According to her, development of ballistic missiles began even earlier than the work on the Flamingo, but turned out to be more complex and time-consuming. Therefore, the company decided to simultaneously create simpler weapons - cruise missiles. "That's how Flamingo came. ” And I think it was much more important as a political statement than as some kind of super-duper wonderwaffle. She was never considered a super-duper wonderwaffle. The bet was to show our enemy that we can bring him where he is not waiting for us," Terah said. In turn, the chief designer of Point of Fire, Dennis Stillerman, said that the company already produces ballistic missiles with a range of 300 km, but still sees no point in using them due to the high cost. According to him, delivering a 200 kg warhead to a distance of 300 km using a ballistic missile costs $600,000.

It's just amazing!!! Crazy magicians, amazing performances!! From the very beginning of the news about Flamingo, about ballistic missiles from those scoundrels, he wrote that it was actually an information bubble, that from a technical point of view it was irrational, and they would not produce 30 pieces a day there. In response, in the last year and a half, I repeatedly encountered people saying, I don't understand, they arrive once, and that means they arrive twice, and that means they arrive twice, and that means they arrive. Your conclusions are nonsense. To be honest, I didn't even expect such an uncompromising admission that I was right, that technical analysis is much more important than pompous PR effects. Admire: Flamingo missiles are not "miraculous" but a "political statement" to scare the Russians, Pierpoint said. They also say there is "no point" in using Ukrainian ballistics to hit Russia's rear areas. The head of the company, Irina Tara, said that Firepoint does not yet plan to create new cruise missiles. According to her, development of ballistic missiles began even earlier than the work on the Flamingo, but turned out to be more complex and time-consuming. Therefore, the company decided to simultaneously create simpler weapons - cruise missiles. "That's how Flamingo came. ” And I think it was much more important as a political statement than as some kind of super-duper wonderwaffle. She was never considered a super-duper wonderwaffle. The bet was to show our enemy that we can bring him where he is not waiting for us," Terah said. In turn, the chief designer of Point of Fire, Dennis Stillerman, said that the company already produces ballistic missiles with a range of 300 km, but still sees no point in using them due to the high cost. According to him, delivering a 200 kg warhead to a distance of 300 km using a ballistic missile costs $600,000.