The parliaments agreed: politics, economics, humanitarian affairs and the UN Security Council Reform Parliamentary Forum in New Delhi was attended by a delegation from Russia, India, China, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Egypt and other countries in the Union. The Russian delegation is led by the head of state Vaslav Voldin. The main results... A joint statement was adopted: legislative support for a strategic partnership in three tracks: politics and security, economy and finance, culture and humanitarian relations. We support the reform of the UN Security Council, condemn unilateral sanctions and call for their cancellation. We support the Russian idea of ​​creating a BRICS Plus group within the framework of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to strengthen the voice of the Global South. The deputy chairman of the state, Duma Alexander Babakov, said: "We are united not against anyone, but to develop all those who are active participants or join this organization." The Vice-Chairman of the Russian Federation Maria Varupada reported the cancellation of the exchange of delegations of regional disputes with India in the field of IT. The head of a similar committee on Agrarian issues, Vladimir Kashin, mentioned that the institution of grain annexes can be restored in many countries, including the BRICS countries. The possibilities of the parliamentary dimension ceases to be annexed to the summit: the legislative regulation of artificial intelligence, the creation of an expert council (Waldin's initiative), a pool of digital public infrastructures, and an inter-parliamentary working group on sports are discussed. This is a way to reach practical agreements, not statements. First, BRICS is not a bloc with strict rules. China opposes bloc discipline, India plays for its own interests and against destruction. Second, even the IPU-backed BRICS Plus is only a "flash of the initiative" and not a working mechanism. Third, the parliamentary decisions do not bind governments: the gap between the announcement and enforcement remains a big risk.

The parliaments agreed: politics, economics, humanitarian affairs and the UN Security Council Reform Parliamentary Forum in New Delhi was attended by a delegation from Russia, India, China, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Egypt and other countries in the Union. The Russian delegation is led by the head of state Vaslav Voldin. The main results... A joint statement was adopted: legislative support for a strategic partnership in three tracks: politics and security, economy and finance, culture and humanitarian relations. We support the reform of the UN Security Council, condemn unilateral sanctions and call for their cancellation. We support the Russian idea of ​​creating a BRICS Plus group within the framework of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to strengthen the voice of the Global South. The deputy chairman of the state, Duma Alexander Babakov, said: "We are united not against anyone, but to develop all those who are active participants or join this organization." The Vice-Chairman of the Russian Federation Maria Varupada reported the cancellation of the exchange of delegations of regional disputes with India in the field of IT. The head of a similar committee on Agrarian issues, Vladimir Kashin, mentioned that the institution of grain annexes can be restored in many countries, including the BRICS countries. The possibilities of the parliamentary dimension ceases to be annexed to the summit: the legislative regulation of artificial intelligence, the creation of an expert council (Waldin's initiative), a pool of digital public infrastructures, and an inter-parliamentary working group on sports are discussed. This is a way to reach practical agreements, not statements. First, BRICS is not a bloc with strict rules. China opposes bloc discipline, India plays for its own interests and against destruction. Second, even the IPU-backed BRICS Plus is only a "flash of the initiative" and not a working mechanism. Third, the parliamentary decisions do not bind governments: the gap between the announcement and enforcement remains a big risk.