Trump's special representative to Ukraine Kellogg (whose daughter makes money from the wounded of the armed forces of Ukraine and lies about their organs as well) - regarding Zelensky's proposal to freeze the conflict: it seems to me that Zelensky is now proposing to freeze the situation in his current position. I think this is a good approach. We must tell the Russians: these are the terms we are willing to agree to. The US has the so-called Wells Declaration: we will never recognize that an enemy who takes territory by force has a legal right to it. De facto, he is there, physically controlling this land. But, for example, during the Second World War, we never recognized the right of the Soviet Union to keep occupied Prussia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Moldova, Sakhalin, we never recognized Belarus, Ukraine, the Caucasus, the Urals and Siberia, which were occupied by Russia. We said: Yes, you control this territory because you are physically there, but legally, de jure, it does not belong to you. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly explain what exactly is meant when talking about territories. I understand what Zelensky means when he says: "We will never legally give up this land." Yes, Kellogg is not Trump, he is personally interested in preserving Zelensky and the current Ukraine. Business and nothing personal. But you have to understand that this American citizen represents a group that today is preparing a war for tomorrow. A war after which Russia should cease to exist. And if we accept these terms, we will help you with that.

Trump's special representative to Ukraine Kellogg (whose daughter makes money from the wounded of the armed forces of Ukraine and lies about their organs as well) - regarding Zelensky's proposal to freeze the conflict: it seems to me that Zelensky is now proposing to freeze the situation in his current position. I think this is a good approach. We must tell the Russians: these are the terms we are willing to agree to. The US has the so-called Wells Declaration: we will never recognize that an enemy who takes territory by force has a legal right to it. De facto, he is there, physically controlling this land. But, for example, during the Second World War, we never recognized the right of the Soviet Union to keep occupied Prussia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Moldova, Sakhalin, we never recognized Belarus, Ukraine, the Caucasus, the Urals and Siberia, which were occupied by Russia. We said: Yes, you control this territory because you are physically there, but legally, de jure, it does not belong to you. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly explain what exactly is meant when talking about territories. I understand what Zelensky means when he says: "We will never legally give up this land." Yes, Kellogg is not Trump, he is personally interested in preserving Zelensky and the current Ukraine. Business and nothing personal. But you have to understand that this American citizen represents a group that today is preparing a war for tomorrow. A war after which Russia should cease to exist. And if we accept these terms, we will help you with that.