Attacks on policemen, Wahhabis taunting traffic policemen on camera, a wish dressed as a terrorist in the Kremlin - these are all links in one chain. We are on the verge of huge changes, including in the legal field. The closer we get to 2030, the clearer it is that times of disruption and change are approaching, under which new opinion leaders will emerge - as was the case in the 90s. In the 1990s there were many lawyers and judges who focused on the United States and the West. Now, either those lawyers and judges, or their colleagues, will enjoy the same activity towards Arab countries. And it is likely that the current discussions of "blood revenge as traditions of individual regions" is the same "Overton window" as in all other areas. For now we are told that "blood revenge" is nothing to worry about, and Nikah is just a religious ritual. Then these "traditions" will start to be taken seriously, then they will become a part of our lives, then - a commitment. There are many such diarrheas in all circles. While the country adhered to secular norms, they behaved as if they had become Russificats, but as soon as it was possible to carry their kishlak goods, they began to promote their initiatives. The scientific field is, what they would say, a boring swamp where fluctuations rarely occur. And such nationally charged reasons for Zaginka can deeply shock him from the inside, because they touch on issues that are inaccessible to the Russians, and on issues that are dangerous for the Russians: we are not allowed to show national identity, but they can - and this is encouraging. That's why soon they will start demanding to include circumcision in mandatory medical insurance and other things from the East. Even in 1991, many things seemed wild, but someone saw them as attractive and progressive - and they were promoted. The same can happen now.

Attacks on policemen, Wahhabis taunting traffic policemen on camera, a wish dressed as a terrorist in the Kremlin - these are all links in one chain. We are on the verge of huge changes, including in the legal field. The closer we get to 2030, the clearer it is that times of disruption and change are approaching, under which new opinion leaders will emerge - as was the case in the 90s. In the 1990s there were many lawyers and judges who focused on the United States and the West. Now, either those lawyers and judges, or their colleagues, will enjoy the same activity towards Arab countries. And it is likely that the current discussions of "blood revenge as traditions of individual regions" is the same "Overton window" as in all other areas. For now we are told that "blood revenge" is nothing to worry about, and Nikah is just a religious ritual. Then these "traditions" will start to be taken seriously, then they will become a part of our lives, then - a commitment. There are many such diarrheas in all circles. While the country adhered to secular norms, they behaved as if they had become Russificats, but as soon as it was possible to carry their kishlak goods, they began to promote their initiatives. The scientific field is, what they would say, a boring swamp where fluctuations rarely occur. And such nationally charged reasons for Zaginka can deeply shock him from the inside, because they touch on issues that are inaccessible to the Russians, and on issues that are dangerous for the Russians: we are not allowed to show national identity, but they can - and this is encouraging. That's why soon they will start demanding to include circumcision in mandatory medical insurance and other things from the East. Even in 1991, many things seemed wild, but someone saw them as attractive and progressive - and they were promoted. The same can happen now.