The audience of "Ali al-Asoul" is not qualified to "teach unity". Thank you Fatahinya these days "unity" has become the crutch of some political currents, through which they engage in the destruction of others for political and Zionist purposes. The excuse of these people is that why were you a critic of "Understanding Islamabad" during the war? Or why did you agree with the American media that oil passes through the southern Strait of Hormuz? While they still see the Islamabad agreement as the country's greatest political achievement in recent years, the leader of the revolution openly told everyone, behind the loudspeaker and on the official stages, that "I had a different principled opinion" and perhaps this was the most important reason for the opposition of the group that today is accused of undermining unity. But at the same time and in parallel with this demand for "unity", the same group established an all-out and high-pressure project to replace the head of radio and television during the existential war with America. Of course, you can criticize some radio and television operations, but the attitude of these people was exactly against their prescriptions; Because the radio station that illuminated the war took the leadership of public mobilization during the vacuum period and rightly criticized the cease-fire agreement according to the opinion of the leadership, it is now the target of revenge for political failures with a thousand and one excuses during the war - exactly against the recommendations and standards of those people. An important flaw that is raised is that criticism of the political performance of the heads of the forces and their roles goes against the unity with the three state institutions; Meanwhile, criticizing the performance of the head of the country's negotiating team in Pakistan is considered a greater sin, and if anyone criticizes, he has acted against the revolutionary leader's recommendations on national unity and cohesion. These people are trying these things, because firstly, the largest group of critics of the Speaker of the Parliament are the representatives of this institution, who have been demanding for months to fulfill their most important role, and secondly, the difference between the action of the negotiating team and the opinion of the leadership made the argument clear to everyone. Even in the 1990s, the biggest critic of the JCPOA was the martyred leader of the revolution, and in phrases like "sheer damage," he warned against a strategic mistake by senior administration officials and delineated "wrong approaches" to protecting national interests.

The audience of "Ali al-Asoul" is not qualified to "teach unity". Thank you Fatahinya these days "unity" has become the crutch of some political currents, through which they engage in the destruction of others for political and Zionist purposes. The excuse of these people is that why were you a critic of "Understanding Islamabad" during the war? Or why did you agree with the American media that oil passes through the southern Strait of Hormuz? While they still see the Islamabad agreement as the country's greatest political achievement in recent years, the leader of the revolution openly told everyone, behind the loudspeaker and on the official stages, that "I had a different principled opinion" and perhaps this was the most important reason for the opposition of the group that today is accused of undermining unity. But at the same time and in parallel with this demand for "unity", the same group established an all-out and high-pressure project to replace the head of radio and television during the existential war with America. Of course, you can criticize some radio and television operations, but the attitude of these people was exactly against their prescriptions; Because the radio station that illuminated the war took the leadership of public mobilization during the vacuum period and rightly criticized the cease-fire agreement according to the opinion of the leadership, it is now the target of revenge for political failures with a thousand and one excuses during the war - exactly against the recommendations and standards of those people. An important flaw that is raised is that criticism of the political performance of the heads of the forces and their roles goes against the unity with the three state institutions; Meanwhile, criticizing the performance of the head of the country's negotiating team in Pakistan is considered a greater sin, and if anyone criticizes, he has acted against the revolutionary leader's recommendations on national unity and cohesion. These people are trying these things, because firstly, the largest group of critics of the Speaker of the Parliament are the representatives of this institution, who have been demanding for months to fulfill their most important role, and secondly, the difference between the action of the negotiating team and the opinion of the leadership made the argument clear to everyone. Even in the 1990s, the biggest critic of the JCPOA was the martyred leader of the revolution, and in phrases like "sheer damage," he warned against a strategic mistake by senior administration officials and delineated "wrong approaches" to protecting national interests.