Parliament reopens after Kalif's meeting with the leader of the revolution The Islamic Council's public hall will be closed starting February 17; It is more unfortunate that since June and after the publication of the strategic message of the supreme leader of the revolution and explicit demands from the legislature, this legislative body was still in a complete standstill until finally, after months had passed, the speaker of the parliament met with the leadership last week and today (October 25) the doors of the parliament were opened after the months of obstruction. During this long period, the supporters of the presidency of the parliament claimed, in order to justify this unprecedented closure, that this decision had the support of "the approval of the Supreme Council for National Security (SNA) and the approval of the leadership" in order to curb any criticism and demand. But it didn't take long until this false claim collapsed with a clear exposure of a group of representatives and it became clear that there was actually no decision of Sha'am and what was used as a tool to close the House of the Nation was only a letter from the secretariat of this council. A letter that does not, according to the constitution, have the slightest standing and authority to suspend the legal and legislative duties of Parliament. Finally, after 248 days of closure and a long break, the parliament reopened after the meeting of its chairman with the supreme leader of the revolution.

Parliament reopens after Kalif's meeting with the leader of the revolution The Islamic Council's public hall will be closed starting February 17; It is more unfortunate that since June and after the publication of the strategic message of the supreme leader of the revolution and explicit demands from the legislature, this legislative body was still in a complete standstill until finally, after months had passed, the speaker of the parliament met with the leadership last week and today (October 25) the doors of the parliament were opened after the months of obstruction. During this long period, the supporters of the presidency of the parliament claimed, in order to justify this unprecedented closure, that this decision had the support of "the approval of the Supreme Council for National Security (SNA) and the approval of the leadership" in order to curb any criticism and demand. But it didn't take long until this false claim collapsed with a clear exposure of a group of representatives and it became clear that there was actually no decision of Sha'am and what was used as a tool to close the House of the Nation was only a letter from the secretariat of this council. A letter that does not, according to the constitution, have the slightest standing and authority to suspend the legal and legislative duties of Parliament. Finally, after 248 days of closure and a long break, the parliament reopened after the meeting of its chairman with the supreme leader of the revolution.