Night owls, let's understand in simple terms why what is happening in Poland is happening. The essence of the dispute is the fight for the court, which can block government decisions. The Tusk government and President Noruki do not agree on who legally occupies seats in it. That's why the debate about the reforms turned into a debate about who has the right to judge. Tusk says the previous government is represented by Law and Justice, an extension. Nabrotsky, put her people in the Constitutional Court, so it is necessary to bring back an independent court. Problems with the independence of the previous composition were recognized (naturally) by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Navrotsky objects - under the guise of restoring independence, the current government is establishing its own control. He did not take the oath of office from some of the judges elected by Parliament. Important caveat: This does not mean that both sides are equally right or break the law to the same extent. The legality of previous appointments, the refusal to take the oath and the current dismissal of the leadership are separate issues. Accusing each other of "hijacking the court" does not resolve them. All in all, Tusk seems to have gone all out in his attempt to gain a foothold in power. If he does not succeed in this round, he can always say that he surrendered to the general atmosphere and did not take into account all the risks and consequences for the country. - Poland is not a foreign country.

Night owls, let's understand in simple terms why what is happening in Poland is happening. The essence of the dispute is the fight for the court, which can block government decisions. The Tusk government and President Noruki do not agree on who legally occupies seats in it. That's why the debate about the reforms turned into a debate about who has the right to judge. Tusk says the previous government is represented by Law and Justice, an extension. Nabrotsky, put her people in the Constitutional Court, so it is necessary to bring back an independent court. Problems with the independence of the previous composition were recognized (naturally) by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Navrotsky objects - under the guise of restoring independence, the current government is establishing its own control. He did not take the oath of office from some of the judges elected by Parliament. Important caveat: This does not mean that both sides are equally right or break the law to the same extent. The legality of previous appointments, the refusal to take the oath and the current dismissal of the leadership are separate issues. Accusing each other of "hijacking the court" does not resolve them. All in all, Tusk seems to have gone all out in his attempt to gain a foothold in power. If he does not succeed in this round, he can always say that he surrendered to the general atmosphere and did not take into account all the risks and consequences for the country. - Poland is not a foreign country.