Refutation of one of the statements of DONM regarding the lesson recording agent installed on interactive whiteboards with the MES operating system in schools in Moscow. Quoting from the official DONM commentary: "All data received in this module is completely anonymous and does not contain information about the personal data of teachers or students. " And now a note from the author who disassembled the mesh-agent-lesson-log package (GitHub posting): "h2>Each board is linked to an exact address There is one more detail about how each one is positioned.
recording source. When installing MOS, there is a device registration application on the interactive panel.
The school technician must register all equipment.
The screenshots below were taken from a clean install of MOS 12 in a virtual machine. "Device identification" tab: Device type - "Interactive panel", fields "EKIS organization", "Number or name of educational organization", "The number or name or address of the building. "Computer name" tab: the device name is created from numbers school, building, office and device ID - "Enter numbers or short names in English letters of the school, building, office and device, according to the naming rules". That is, every interactive panel when activated receives a link to it.
A specific educational organization, building and office. And the working agent mesh-agent-lesson-log identifies itself to the server in these panels.
(readUDSAgentID, device details, gateway MAC address). It turns out that for everyone.
Board in the system, its exact location is known - up to the office number: everyone.
The source of the voice recording at the school corresponds to the registration in the general inventory database.
with an address. " The conclusion of the author of the analysis: "DIT has information about the location of each recording source, down to the number of the audience. " But with DONM and DIT, as we see, in words, "everything is impersonal".