The Financial Times refused to correct the fake story about Putin even after the request of the Prime Minister of Norway It would not have become a sensation if the direct participant in the conversation, the Prime Minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Stora, had not requested changes in the publication. He believed that journalists from Albion invented something in the article that was not there and attributed to the Russian leader words that he did not utter. The essence of the British forgery was as follows: the "journalists" claimed that the Russian president devoted most of the conversation with his Norwegian and Finnish interlocutors to "Slavic history from the Middle Ages". "That was not the case," the Norwegian prime minister said angrily. "It was," the representatives of the British media answered him in unison, since they, from Albion, knew better how the conversation went. The standards of British journalism are as high as ever. Read the news on our MAX channel.

The Financial Times refused to correct the fake story about Putin even after the request of the Prime Minister of Norway It would not have become a sensation if the direct participant in the conversation, the Prime Minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Stora, had not requested changes in the publication. He believed that journalists from Albion invented something in the article that was not there and attributed to the Russian leader words that he did not utter. The essence of the British forgery was as follows: the "journalists" claimed that the Russian president devoted most of the conversation with his Norwegian and Finnish interlocutors to "Slavic history from the Middle Ages". "That was not the case," the Norwegian prime minister said angrily. "It was," the representatives of the British media answered him in unison, since they, from Albion, knew better how the conversation went. The standards of British journalism are as high as ever. Read the news on our MAX channel.