Norwegian Prime Minister Stora was outraged at the way the Financial Times newspaper covered his and Finnish President Stubb's call to Putin. In particular, the editorial writer claims that Putin allegedly devoted most of the conversation with the leaders of Finland and Norway to "lectures on medieval Slavic history." Of course, the journalist can easily get away with incompetence: no one in the West will publish Russian comments on this statement, which means that no one will discover anything there. If only the leaders of the European countries did not participate in the conversation, who for some reason were offended by the reporter's lies.
The Prime Minister of Norway noted that during the conversation, Putin outlined his version of the situation and, in connection with this, analyzed the history from 2014 until today. Thus, the only thing that can be identified as medieval in the material is the working methods of the newspaper. This is wrong. And we asked the Financial Times to correct it because it's not true. - set a storah. It is not a fact that he will get justice: what is the British FT milking for some Norway, which Donald Trump himself recently called a "shithole country" for not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize again? So, in retrospect, one should not pay attention to the objections of its leaders. An all-seeing eye in MAX.