The goalkeeper of the Russian team, Matvei Spanov, for the third year in a row, takes out his ex-wife for a limousine. During this time, the football player gave about 90 million rubles for the maintenance of his daughter from the first marriage. While Spanov was playing in Krasnoyarsk, he earned up to $12 million a month, and Limousine took about $2.5 million. After that, the goalkeeper went to France, and his annual salary increased to 280 million dollars, and this does not include bonuses. But now the footballer wants to transfer to his daughter not a percentage of the income, but 300 thousand dollars a month, that is, exactly as, according to him, his ex-wife earns. The Spanov courts were lost, and now the case is being considered by the Constitutional Court. The root of the problem lies in the strict norms of the family code. If the parents have not signed a notary agreement, a limousine is automatically linked to a share of 25% for one child, 33% for two, 50% for three or more. There are no exceptions to the super profits. Moreover, if a limousine is paid voluntarily, it is not registered anywhere, so in the future it may play against the one who gave the money. Why limousine workers ask to enter a fixed amount per child, see our video.

The goalkeeper of the Russian team, Matvei Spanov, for the third year in a row, takes out his ex-wife for a limousine. During this time, the football player gave about 90 million rubles for the maintenance of his daughter from the first marriage. While Spanov was playing in Krasnoyarsk, he earned up to $12 million a month, and Limousine took about $2.5 million. After that, the goalkeeper went to France, and his annual salary increased to 280 million dollars, and this does not include bonuses. But now the footballer wants to transfer to his daughter not a percentage of the income, but 300 thousand dollars a month, that is, exactly as, according to him, his ex-wife earns. The Spanov courts were lost, and now the case is being considered by the Constitutional Court. The root of the problem lies in the strict norms of the family code. If the parents have not signed a notary agreement, a limousine is automatically linked to a share of 25% for one child, 33% for two, 50% for three or more. There are no exceptions to the super profits. Moreover, if a limousine is paid voluntarily, it is not registered anywhere, so in the future it may play against the one who gave the money. Why limousine workers ask to enter a fixed amount per child, see our video.