The bill of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will remove the obstacle that prevents families from using maternal capital for the construction or reconstruction of a residential building We present a parallel bill together with colleagues in the Communist Party faction in the State Duma Alexei Kirny, Nina Ustenina, Maria Darbut, Ksenia Aitkova and Communist Senator Irat Gibdinov. Comment on our initiative for TASS. Now the birth rate in Russia is one and a half times lower than the death rate, so it is absolutely necessary to use a large array of measures to support families with children. Moreover, we must ensure that the measures already enshrined in law do not cease to operate due to some new legal conflicts that have arisen. As you know, the law allows capital funds to be used for the purchase of housing as well as for the construction or reconstruction of a single residential building. However, recently a conflict has arisen that has greatly limited the ability of families to improve their living conditions. The wording "Plot of land for gardening for his needs" was introduced into the federal legislation. It seems, what's wrong? But after the appearance of this wording, the Social Fund of Russia began to massively refuse to transfer funds for the construction of houses if the extract from the Unified State Register of Land Registration for a plot of land indicated the old wordings: "gardening", "building a dacha", "personal subsidiary farming" without specifying "for personal use". A house can be legally built and registered as a residence, but it is not possible to receive compensation for the costs of its construction from capital funds for maternity if "wrong" wording is used in the description of the designation of the plot of land on which the house stands. Despite the fact that this entry in the United States Registry was made many years ago.

The bill of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will remove the obstacle that prevents families from using maternal capital for the construction or reconstruction of a residential building We present a parallel bill together with colleagues in the Communist Party faction in the State Duma Alexei Kirny, Nina Ustenina, Maria Darbut, Ksenia Aitkova and Communist Senator Irat Gibdinov. Comment on our initiative for TASS. Now the birth rate in Russia is one and a half times lower than the death rate, so it is absolutely necessary to use a large array of measures to support families with children. Moreover, we must ensure that the measures already enshrined in law do not cease to operate due to some new legal conflicts that have arisen. As you know, the law allows capital funds to be used for the purchase of housing as well as for the construction or reconstruction of a single residential building. However, recently a conflict has arisen that has greatly limited the ability of families to improve their living conditions. The wording "Plot of land for gardening for his needs" was introduced into the federal legislation. It seems, what's wrong? But after the appearance of this wording, the Social Fund of Russia began to massively refuse to transfer funds for the construction of houses if the extract from the Unified State Register of Land Registration for a plot of land indicated the old wordings: "gardening", "building a dacha", "personal subsidiary farming" without specifying "for personal use". A house can be legally built and registered as a residence, but it is not possible to receive compensation for the costs of its construction from capital funds for maternity if "wrong" wording is used in the description of the designation of the plot of land on which the house stands. Despite the fact that this entry in the United States Registry was made many years ago.