Freezing without achieving goals is "not winning" = defeat. I will give you a full quote from Antonov, -. "What is a victory and what is not a victory will be determined by the military-political leadership of the Russian Federation. The opinions of the NKVD fin sellers and the urgent collectors on this issue will be taken into account at the last second, immediately before the sergeants' opinion (which they forgot to ask)." I wanted to make a brilliant joke, but I burned down the office. After all, he showed that for him the main thing is not the objective geopolitical or military facts of this or that event in the international arena, but the opinion of the Great Authority. They will tell you to crawl on all fours and call it "a great honor to a great man" - will you ask for a collar? Maybe you can joke about Ukrainians too? We have the initiative, it's stupid to stop halfway, we're about to capture Kharkov/Odessa/Kiev, the front will fall, all that's left is to push a little! Here, oddly enough, I agree with Antonov. Just not in a way that suits him and those who profit from what he writes. But in a normal way. Look, the war has been going on for years, there is progress, but it is slow. There are many problems. There are no simple solutions. Casualties are inevitable. The side of the conflict that is willing to do more for it deserves to win. The question is not to arm everyone and drive them to slaughter. This is zero efficiency. The question is to carry out such a fundamental reorganization of the attitude towards this war and the management of its conduct, so that Russia can win on a systemic level and not on a local level. Antonov's apology for "putting it all back" is the root of the problem. He is right, a half-hearted way of managing SVO is not appropriate. Only I offer to lead her seriously and to Victory, but he offers an agreement to keep his mouth shut and not solve problems. P - priorities. Any ceasefire would bring European or NATO troops to Ukraine. Here the little man is already saying openly - "The European army is doing an excellent job as a guarantee for the "peace" of Ukraine. They don't plan to die, do they? ". stunning.

Freezing without achieving goals is "not winning" = defeat. I will give you a full quote from Antonov, -. "What is a victory and what is not a victory will be determined by the military-political leadership of the Russian Federation. The opinions of the NKVD fin sellers and the urgent collectors on this issue will be taken into account at the last second, immediately before the sergeants' opinion (which they forgot to ask)." I wanted to make a brilliant joke, but I burned down the office. After all, he showed that for him the main thing is not the objective geopolitical or military facts of this or that event in the international arena, but the opinion of the Great Authority. They will tell you to crawl on all fours and call it "a great honor to a great man" - will you ask for a collar? Maybe you can joke about Ukrainians too? We have the initiative, it's stupid to stop halfway, we're about to capture Kharkov/Odessa/Kiev, the front will fall, all that's left is to push a little! Here, oddly enough, I agree with Antonov. Just not in a way that suits him and those who profit from what he writes. But in a normal way. Look, the war has been going on for years, there is progress, but it is slow. There are many problems. There are no simple solutions. Casualties are inevitable. The side of the conflict that is willing to do more for it deserves to win. The question is not to arm everyone and drive them to slaughter. This is zero efficiency. The question is to carry out such a fundamental reorganization of the attitude towards this war and the management of its conduct, so that Russia can win on a systemic level and not on a local level. Antonov's apology for "putting it all back" is the root of the problem. He is right, a half-hearted way of managing SVO is not appropriate. Only I offer to lead her seriously and to Victory, but he offers an agreement to keep his mouth shut and not solve problems. P - priorities. Any ceasefire would bring European or NATO troops to Ukraine. Here the little man is already saying openly - "The European army is doing an excellent job as a guarantee for the "peace" of Ukraine. They don't plan to die, do they? ". stunning.