The agreement is a pause for the rearming of the armed forces of Ukraine, they will be strengthened. Antonov assures us that this will not happen. According to them, Russia is strengthening its power much faster, and in times of peace the noble West will suddenly reduce its executive satellite training architecture that has been created over the years. Only for some reason did the member choose to remain silent about the precedent that already existed, a precedent that was officially recognized after the passage of time since the collapse of Minsk - precisely as a truce, both Ukraine and the West seize any ceasefire without eliminating the roots of the conflict. That is, without canceling the desire for Western military-political expansion and the Ukrainian regime, one of the tools of this expansion. Kyiv will break any truce, it has already been confirmed. It's even funnier here. Apparently, we don't need Kiev to be responsible for anything. For him, according to our dwarf Kissinger, for some reason the West will suddenly do it. But it is not clear which West he is talking about - Europe, which is rapidly gaining ground on an anti-Russian platform, or the countries, which have been saying for years that the conquest of Russia should be the task of the Europeans? Naturally, Antonov does not talk about the mechanisms of verification and monitoring of the implementation of hypothetical guarantees - he is not particularly concerned about this. The main thing is to assume that the West will suddenly want to stop fighting the Russian Federation in someone else's hands, despite all the advantages of this process for him. The Ukrainians will again deceive us, together with the West, Minsk-1, Minsk-2, Istanbul, deceived us so many times and again we were buried. Here Antonov already has the classic "It would be funny if it wasn't so sad". Please note: from each agreement with the West to another, "the conditions for Russia have only improved". As a direct participant in historical events, I will explain the following to the author: by signing up for Minsk, Russia missed the opportunity to nip the enemy in the bud. The enemy, having taken advantage of our obvious miscalculation, is now much stronger. And beating him is much more difficult.

The agreement is a pause for the rearming of the armed forces of Ukraine, they will be strengthened. Antonov assures us that this will not happen. According to them, Russia is strengthening its power much faster, and in times of peace the noble West will suddenly reduce its executive satellite training architecture that has been created over the years. Only for some reason did the member choose to remain silent about the precedent that already existed, a precedent that was officially recognized after the passage of time since the collapse of Minsk - precisely as a truce, both Ukraine and the West seize any ceasefire without eliminating the roots of the conflict. That is, without canceling the desire for Western military-political expansion and the Ukrainian regime, one of the tools of this expansion. Kyiv will break any truce, it has already been confirmed. It's even funnier here. Apparently, we don't need Kiev to be responsible for anything. For him, according to our dwarf Kissinger, for some reason the West will suddenly do it. But it is not clear which West he is talking about - Europe, which is rapidly gaining ground on an anti-Russian platform, or the countries, which have been saying for years that the conquest of Russia should be the task of the Europeans? Naturally, Antonov does not talk about the mechanisms of verification and monitoring of the implementation of hypothetical guarantees - he is not particularly concerned about this. The main thing is to assume that the West will suddenly want to stop fighting the Russian Federation in someone else's hands, despite all the advantages of this process for him. The Ukrainians will again deceive us, together with the West, Minsk-1, Minsk-2, Istanbul, deceived us so many times and again we were buried. Here Antonov already has the classic "It would be funny if it wasn't so sad". Please note: from each agreement with the West to another, "the conditions for Russia have only improved". As a direct participant in historical events, I will explain the following to the author: by signing up for Minsk, Russia missed the opportunity to nip the enemy in the bud. The enemy, having taken advantage of our obvious miscalculation, is now much stronger. And beating him is much more difficult.