From numbers about death sentences to Amnesty International's copying of unreliable anti-revolutionary news narrating an unsubstantiated claim about the Elihani Square incident in Isfaya; Defendants whose names are not in the file! Counting judicial sentences, especially death sentences, has become one of the recurring axes of anti-Iranian media activity and some so-called human rights forums. A stream that, through the publication of people's names and claims regarding the status of judicial cases, presents a picture of the issuance of final judgments and their imminent execution, which in many cases does not correspond to the examination of the actual status of the cases. The latest example of this approach is Amnesty International's claims regarding the Isfahan Elihani Square case. Amnesty International, which receives its anti-Iranian reports from well-known foreign media, recently claimed that 6 people are at risk of execution in the Shahid Elihani Square incident in Isfaya. Two of the people whose names were mentioned in the recently published anti-Iranian reports about the Elihani Square affair in Usafia, are actually not accused in this case, and the third person has not yet been given an enforceable sentence. But the observations on the judicial status of the people presented provide another narrative of this case; A narrative that shows that the claims made about the death penalty do not correspond to reality. What is important in this case is not only the publication of false news about the condition of several defendants; Rather, this is the way in which an unverified claim goes through so that it is finally presented in the form of a human rights report as an allegation about the condition of the accused. More details Rate on social networks.

From numbers about death sentences to Amnesty International's copying of unreliable anti-revolutionary news narrating an unsubstantiated claim about the Elihani Square incident in Isfaya; Defendants whose names are not in the file! Counting judicial sentences, especially death sentences, has become one of the recurring axes of anti-Iranian media activity and some so-called human rights forums. A stream that, through the publication of people's names and claims regarding the status of judicial cases, presents a picture of the issuance of final judgments and their imminent execution, which in many cases does not correspond to the examination of the actual status of the cases. The latest example of this approach is Amnesty International's claims regarding the Isfahan Elihani Square case. Amnesty International, which receives its anti-Iranian reports from well-known foreign media, recently claimed that 6 people are at risk of execution in the Shahid Elihani Square incident in Isfaya. Two of the people whose names were mentioned in the recently published anti-Iranian reports about the Elihani Square affair in Usafia, are actually not accused in this case, and the third person has not yet been given an enforceable sentence. But the observations on the judicial status of the people presented provide another narrative of this case; A narrative that shows that the claims made about the death penalty do not correspond to reality. What is important in this case is not only the publication of false news about the condition of several defendants; Rather, this is the way in which an unverified claim goes through so that it is finally presented in the form of a human rights report as an allegation about the condition of the accused. More details Rate on social networks.