details of the film director's case; Absence of the accused in the investigation and court sessions, there is still a right to appeal within the legal deadline. In the last few days, the news was published about a verdict in the case of one of the cinema managers, which caused various reactions. Mizan's follow-up to this case shows that in April of this year and at the same time as Israel's military aggression, the state's attorney general announced crimes against a number of cyberspace activists, celebrities and artists with positions against national security and in favor of Israel and the US, and asked to prosecute the criminal property of these people, to prosecute the property of these people. The manager in question was one of those people for whom a legal case was filed. Later, the case was transferred to the Culture and Communications Prosecutor's Office and the investigator continued to summon the accused; But even though he was summoned, he did not participate in any of the interrogation sessions. The summons for the aforementioned proceedings was issued on charges of media activity and propaganda against state security, subject to section 4 of the law on aggravated punishment of espionage and cooperation with Israel and countries hostile to security, and the case was transferred to court. Despite the defendant being summoned by the court, he did not come to the hearing. Finally, according to the case documents, the defendant's influence, the virtual and media activity as a partner and partner with Israel, extortion, collusion with foreign allies and the defendant's records, the court found the charge of imputation confirmed and sentenced him to 5 years and one month of actual imprisonment and the confiscation of all government property in his favor. More details Rate on social networks.

details of the film director's case; Absence of the accused in the investigation and court sessions, there is still a right to appeal within the legal deadline. In the last few days, the news was published about a verdict in the case of one of the cinema managers, which caused various reactions. Mizan's follow-up to this case shows that in April of this year and at the same time as Israel's military aggression, the state's attorney general announced crimes against a number of cyberspace activists, celebrities and artists with positions against national security and in favor of Israel and the US, and asked to prosecute the criminal property of these people, to prosecute the property of these people. The manager in question was one of those people for whom a legal case was filed. Later, the case was transferred to the Culture and Communications Prosecutor's Office and the investigator continued to summon the accused; But even though he was summoned, he did not participate in any of the interrogation sessions. The summons for the aforementioned proceedings was issued on charges of media activity and propaganda against state security, subject to section 4 of the law on aggravated punishment of espionage and cooperation with Israel and countries hostile to security, and the case was transferred to court. Despite the defendant being summoned by the court, he did not come to the hearing. Finally, according to the case documents, the defendant's influence, the virtual and media activity as a partner and partner with Israel, extortion, collusion with foreign allies and the defendant's records, the court found the charge of imputation confirmed and sentenced him to 5 years and one month of actual imprisonment and the confiscation of all government property in his favor. More details Rate on social networks.