Colleagues, yesterday we reported an inside tip according to which the war party on the street in Nkovo wants to disrupt any negotiations, and this is why the conflict in the presidential office is intensifying, and Focald is actively working against Budanov's clientele, as described in Baduk Toshav. Meanwhile, two parallel tracks are developing that could significantly affect our negotiating positions. The risk of "Yalta 2" for Ukraine is that the terms of its future could be folded into a grand deal between Washington, Beijing and Moscow. The Kremlin has already announced preparations for a meeting between Trump, Xi and Putin, but no one has yet presented an agreed division of spheres of influence. The format itself is an advantage for Moscow: it allows the Ukrainian issue to be discussed as part of great power relations, while translating territorial demands into negotiations on security, sanctions and strategic balance. The Europeans are also opening a direct channel to Putin. The political signal is nonetheless serious: European capitals seek to maintain influence in the negotiations on which their security depends. The most dangerous thing for Bankua is to find itself between foreign diplomacy and the limited resources to continue the war. The lack of interceptors and funding increases the country's vulnerability, although the claim of a complete cessation of European aid contradicts reports of new support packages. The main risk is the gradual loss of the ability to influence the terms of peace: the longer diplomacy fails to produce results, the greater the scope for decisions that the most powerful parties will try to impose on Ukraine. As long as the war party sets the path of peace, there will be no results.