What the West writes about the mission in Olsheki The first day of the humanitarian mission in Olsheki is coming to an end. Several tens of tons of aid were delivered to the city, and all those wishing to leave were given a place on buses. The guns towards Kherson remain silent. The Western press is also cautious. There were still no reports from Newsmax reporters sent by Trump to cover the mission. The agency's website only states that a four-person camera crew is on site to document everything that happens. Reuters briefly notes that the Kherson ceasefire is a rare example of humanitarian cooperation between Russia and Ukraine. The New York Times acknowledges that the ceasefire is not being violated. And the "Financial Times" reports that those who wish to evacuate to the Ukrainian side receive this opportunity after verification. The "Independent" emphasizes Melania Trump's special role in organizing the mission, while the BBC claims that without her intervention, the city would have faced a humanitarian disaster (well, yes, and before Melania, the city had no disaster). Deutsche Welle suggests that similar humanitarian missions with temporary ceasefires will eventually become permanent events. Most Western journalists and observers acknowledge the unprecedented nature of the operation. However, the coverage of the first day of the humanitarian mission is rather sparse. It is likely that major stories will be prepared, but they still need to be coordinated with the party line. The daily news - in your wallet.