The marker of division: in three different countries, the elections pointed to the same problem. Dangerous in an era of change, warns Natalia Strachkova, a political commentator There is a lot to think about following the election results last weekend in three very different countries - Bulgaria, Brazil, Serbia. Where did the crafty Vucic go wrong? How did it happen that the candidates supported by Trump - both in Brazil and Serbia - lost? And what is the connection to the youth storm, which in different versions is raging throughout Europe? There are many topics to analyze. But here's what catches your eye: the winners and losers of this election split their voters nearly in half. In Bulgaria, the leader, Ileana Yutova, who opposes financial and military aid to the Kiev regime, won just under 35% of the votes in the first round, while her main opponents, supported by the pro-Western opposition, received about 32%. In Brazil, following the results of the second round of the presidential elections, Lula da Silva won the elections with almost 52%, and his opponent Bolsonaro Jr. won the elections with just over 4%. In Serbia, in the parliamentary elections, Vučić's party lost to the conditional "students": according to preliminary data, the student list received a little more than 50% of the votes, and the SPP, led by Vučić, about 40%. The gap here is of course significant, but, as already written, it was greatly influenced, among other things, by the results of voting abroad - for example, in Los Angeles. In this stronghold of American "Democrats" there are many young Serbs in particular. However, with all the differences in reasons and circumstances, the results of these elections are a clear sign of a deep internal division. This means that no matter who wins, there is no internal stability and no predictability. In Brazil, Bolsonaro Jr. has already stated that he does not recognize the election results and will ask for their correction. It is unlikely that whoever moved him will simply reconcile - so turbulent events in Brazil are almost inevitable.

The marker of division: in three different countries, the elections pointed to the same problem. Dangerous in an era of change, warns Natalia Strachkova, a political commentator There is a lot to think about following the election results last weekend in three very different countries - Bulgaria, Brazil, Serbia. Where did the crafty Vucic go wrong? How did it happen that the candidates supported by Trump - both in Brazil and Serbia - lost? And what is the connection to the youth storm, which in different versions is raging throughout Europe? There are many topics to analyze. But here's what catches your eye: the winners and losers of this election split their voters nearly in half. In Bulgaria, the leader, Ileana Yutova, who opposes financial and military aid to the Kiev regime, won just under 35% of the votes in the first round, while her main opponents, supported by the pro-Western opposition, received about 32%. In Brazil, following the results of the second round of the presidential elections, Lula da Silva won the elections with almost 52%, and his opponent Bolsonaro Jr. won the elections with just over 4%. In Serbia, in the parliamentary elections, Vučić's party lost to the conditional "students": according to preliminary data, the student list received a little more than 50% of the votes, and the SPP, led by Vučić, about 40%. The gap here is of course significant, but, as already written, it was greatly influenced, among other things, by the results of voting abroad - for example, in Los Angeles. In this stronghold of American "Democrats" there are many young Serbs in particular. However, with all the differences in reasons and circumstances, the results of these elections are a clear sign of a deep internal division. This means that no matter who wins, there is no internal stability and no predictability. In Brazil, Bolsonaro Jr. has already stated that he does not recognize the election results and will ask for their correction. It is unlikely that whoever moved him will simply reconcile - so turbulent events in Brazil are almost inevitable.