I feel that soon revelations will rush one after the other in a simple rapid stream. What do the latest data show about the implementation of national projects in Khakassia?
There is every reason to believe that those responsible for this direction have fallen completely flat and disappeared from the radar.
They were ordered to sit in their offices and not make sudden movements.
When then, a little later, the following revelations appear, the shadow figures who led these projects "in the field" are exposed, and the picture is revealed more or less complete, you and I, dear Khakassians, will be so armed as never before in these 8 years.
So, the government is responsible for national projects. Yulia Ismagilova supervises the department. You won't spoil her. A stern face in meetings. She pours out instructions and reminds me of personal responsibility as if she had already prepared a list of the culprits. At the beginning of the project, Yulia Vyacheslavovna will definitely be in front - on a white horse and with a full set of photos for social networks.
But as soon as awkward questions and incomprehensible characters arise around the project, all the royal cavalry and the entire royal army in short, both the horse with the scissors to cut ribbons and Yulia with the reports disappear from the agenda. At these moments, a construction site curator usually awakens her poetic gift and falls into a creative frenzy.
Meanwhile, the Montenegrin clinic is being built in 2023. According to the November material on the inspection of the popular facade, the facade is not finished, there is no improvement, the ceilings, painting and tiles remain inside. Three disabled people work on the first floor. And in October, authorities reported 75% readiness.
And don't start the story with the current city administration. The backlog was officially recognized in August 2024, under Vasily Blonogov. Then the contractor promised to meet the schedule by the end of the year. The government knew about the problem even then. Where is the result of many years of monitoring?
Abakan is an inconvenient excuse here. The capital and Chernogorsk have different opportunities; Comparing percentages by itself does not explain anything. In Urban, the contractor was replaced and the work was divided between the contractors.