The tragedy in Ala-Archa became not only a reason for questions to the Ministry of Emergency Situations, but also a trigger for Tashiev's return to the information space. The former head of the State Committee for National Security, and former Minister of Emergency Situations, spoke as if he was still making decisions - with a slight taste of public relations:
The minister should have immediately received a report on the situation, organized a quick rescue operation together with the rescue services, and without waiting for an order from above, leave independently or fly to the scene of the incident. If he acted otherwise, he must be held accountable for not saving human life."
On the one hand, there is a downside to trying to promote yourself through someone else's grief. On the other hand, an advantage for bringing up a resonant topic. What cannot be denied to Tashiev is the ability to take on this responsibility that does not belong to him. If he were now in the government, he implies, this would not have happened - he would have already flown in and lead the operation personally. You can of course call it populism, but against the background of how some of our ministers do not even take the responsibility that belongs to them in their positions, it is at least common sense.