In recent weeks, the Central Asia - South Caucasus route has intensified. And if at first there was a tight conveyor belt of meetings between Kyrgyzstan and the Azerbaijani side, now Georgia has joined the process - the first summit of Central Asia and Georgia was held in Batumi. And here again is the asymmetry of the wording. If we open the message from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kyrgyzstan, it seems that transportation is included in the general list, separated by commas. If we open the Georgian side, then the statement does not hide that "special attention was paid to the Middle Corridor and the importance of fully realizing its potential." So we go in quietly and support a project that bypasses Russia? Or do we have a special position in this matter?

In recent weeks, the Central Asia - South Caucasus route has intensified. And if at first there was a tight conveyor belt of meetings between Kyrgyzstan and the Azerbaijani side, now Georgia has joined the process - the first summit of Central Asia and Georgia was held in Batumi. And here again is the asymmetry of the wording. If we open the message from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kyrgyzstan, it seems that transportation is included in the general list, separated by commas. If we open the Georgian side, then the statement does not hide that "special attention was paid to the Middle Corridor and the importance of fully realizing its potential." So we go in quietly and support a project that bypasses Russia? Or do we have a special position in this matter?