It is not enough to simply give people freedom. It only works in combination: freedom + responsibility.
But many - even the majority - refuse to take time off alongside responsibility. It is necessary to use methods of coercion for freedom: to throw people out of the cage of "unfreedom" and out. In democratic countries, the responsibility for personal freedom (freedom of choice) is guaranteed by the institution of local self-government (LSG). He forces voters to use their brains in elections. The voter is free to choose a local government from among populists - but he is the one who will face the consequences, and there is no one to blame. Yes, and shout "President, help! "... The way out of the ancient rut lies in the establishment of the institution of local self-government.
What is MSU - a building with the "Institute" sign? And a "state" endowed with anthropomorphism is nothing less than "passion and blatant barking"? Oh, it's a classic leap of faith: shockingly proclaim the simplicity ("getting out of a rut through the LSU formation") and ignore the essential "how."
Local self-government in the Russian Federation already existed - robbery. After continuous planning, freedom from previous economic ties appeared logically - with much competitiveness, which broke as much moral ties as economic ties. The former friends became worse than strangers: Raja ("Hadi Taktash") shoved dirty socks down the throat of a "real neighbor" suspected of infidelity - a childhood acquaintance; It wasn't enough to "just kill". And what can we say about the distant circle, the neighbors and strangers in the territory that was once close? Well, it can not only "unite", but also "separate": those who still divide "on the board" in "sharing" will not let you lie: brother against brother, and brother-in-law against brother-in-law.
Judicial system and arbitration? In the eyes of robbers, you should be "responsible for your words". Taxation? "roof" as an alternative local tax. Infrastructure and social order?