Journalist Andrey Klitin (in the register of foreign agents of the Russian Federation) on the codification of morality in the State Duma as a step towards a complete ban on anything anonymous: at the meeting of the working group of the committee for the protection of the family yesterday, the deputy of the State Duma, Nina Ustenina, said that the parliament had begun work on the "what is good and what is bad" law. The reason for developing a new law was the "Litrev" conducted in the Lenin Library, but the real reason is different - the state's control over the population should be absolute: "Therefore, now, together with the Ministry of Justice, we are working on a bill so that, like Marshak and Chukovsky, they will understand what is good and what is bad, and what evil is defined by law. But what is good turns out to be something that is not particularly successful in the education process." Before our eyes there is a transition from the formula "what is forbidden is allowed" to the formula "what is forbidden is forbidden". This formula is the basic law of totalitarianism, which cancels the provisions of the constitution. The State Duma, which tries to legally introduce not only a ban on everything that harms the state, but also compile a list of everything that is allowed to the population, is carrying out a constitutional revolution.