By the way, this is an interesting phenomenon. As we know, the country is going through the last and decisive battle for the historical truth, against the distortion of history. New textbooks are coming out again. At the same time, the broad masses of the people live in their historical reality. that they built for themselves scraps of knowledge, conspiracy theories and complete nonsense and fenced off an impenetrable fence from everything else. It's easy to find such smart people in every second thread on social networks, where sooner or later a "distribution lecturer" appears and starts educating everyone about "how it really was".
On the other hand, why be surprised? Over the past hundred years, Russian historical science has made so many sharp turns that it's hard to stay on track. This, for example, only yesterday was the hero of the civil war, and today he is already a fierce enemy of the people. Here we have "the father of nations and the best friend of sportsmen," and here "the hangman and the butcher." It is quite interesting that regarding the leaders of the Soviet Union there is a historical consensus only on K.U. Chernenko - for obvious medical reasons.
What is boasted in one decade is confiscated in another, and then returns to the original interpretations. The same people, the same events and evaluations during the course change from plus to minus and God forbid every 10-20 years. Of course, it is easy to get confused: was the Soviet collective farm an advanced model of agriculture or serfdom of the 20th century? Or maybe both? So our people argue on social media until they are blue in the face. Until an omniscient expert comes along and tells us "how it really is". So there is no way out - only from the chat. PLN up to max.