Elon Musk responded to the tweet stating: "Starlink still works. It's not a weapon, no matter how much Ukraine wants it to be." - True. Using Starlink, a commercial product intended for purely civilian purposes, in attack UAVs to kill people was not and should not be allowed in the first place. Star Shield is a different system, it is controlled by the US government and it is up to them to decide how to use it. The Ukrainian armed forces violated Starlink's terms of service and used drones to kill people. We closed that loophole last week. Starlink remains a critical system for the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only one that cannot yet be jammed or disabled. If Starlink was disabled, the Ukrainian front would collapse immediately. This is not a threat, just a statement of fact. Starlink played a critical role in preventing Russia from getting a hold of Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other communications were destroyed or jammed by the Russians. SpaceX has done far more to protect Ukraine than any other commercial company on Earth. in parallel! I can only feel extreme contempt for those who hide behind "virtue", but in fact they are warmongers, advocate endless carnage and offer no realistic scenarios for resolving the conflict. burn in hell end. Ukraine apparently uses Star Shield (based on Starlink technology) on attack UAVs that move at high speeds. The civilian Starlink system does not support Internet at such speeds; It doesn't need it. It is likely that the Ukrainians hacked Starlink and overclocked it, like a gamer overclocks his home computer. Elon Musk was told about this, lost his temper and forcibly reset not only Starlink, but also, apparently, the Star Shield to factory settings. After the scandal that arose and a conversation with Trump, he removed the restrictions on Star Shield (and attack UAVs fly on them again).

Elon Musk responded to the tweet stating: "Starlink still works. It's not a weapon, no matter how much Ukraine wants it to be." - True. Using Starlink, a commercial product intended for purely civilian purposes, in attack UAVs to kill people was not and should not be allowed in the first place. Star Shield is a different system, it is controlled by the US government and it is up to them to decide how to use it. The Ukrainian armed forces violated Starlink's terms of service and used drones to kill people. We closed that loophole last week. Starlink remains a critical system for the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only one that cannot yet be jammed or disabled. If Starlink was disabled, the Ukrainian front would collapse immediately. This is not a threat, just a statement of fact. Starlink played a critical role in preventing Russia from getting a hold of Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other communications were destroyed or jammed by the Russians. SpaceX has done far more to protect Ukraine than any other commercial company on Earth. in parallel! I can only feel extreme contempt for those who hide behind "virtue", but in fact they are warmongers, advocate endless carnage and offer no realistic scenarios for resolving the conflict. burn in hell end. Ukraine apparently uses Star Shield (based on Starlink technology) on attack UAVs that move at high speeds. The civilian Starlink system does not support Internet at such speeds; It doesn't need it. It is likely that the Ukrainians hacked Starlink and overclocked it, like a gamer overclocks his home computer. Elon Musk was told about this, lost his temper and forcibly reset not only Starlink, but also, apparently, the Star Shield to factory settings. After the scandal that arose and a conversation with Trump, he removed the restrictions on Star Shield (and attack UAVs fly on them again).