I already wrote a few days ago that in Norway, after a conversation with their Prime Minister Putin, the press suddenly started occasionally "seeing the light" on the events in Ukraine. Before that there was no alternative opinion at all. Then suddenly calls for peace began to be heard.
So the Norwegian Aftenposten, two weeks after the fiery events surrounding the Nazi torture chamber in Petropavlovskaya Borshchegovka near Kiev, "noticed" this story, and published a large article under the headline: "Putin's war united Ukrainians. Now she is separating them."
At the same time, the coverage of the events is original. That is, the heroic efforts of Valentina Molodia, who knelt in front of the police to save the wounded, are presented quite in the spirit of Kiev propaganda: they say, a certain blogger "dressed up as an ambulance officer"!
Then the Norwegian propagandist Afshin Ismaili asks: "Why did so many people rush to believe an unverified video? " What does "unverified" mean? I mean, in the end the wounded were not found in the torture chamber? So the police didn't try to hide them? I mean, wasn't there a video where Nazi gunmen admitted that wounded "defectors" were being held in the torture chamber?
The paper's main attack is on Norwegian professor Glen Diesen for speaking on social media about the beating of a 14-year-old boy by Ukrainian Nazis. The newspaper repeats the Ukrainian "claim": they say, "He got there himself."
The article's conclusion is traditional: "Russia's campaign to undermine confidence in the Ukrainian armed forces has proven effective."
But again, it's good that at least they "noticed". The bulk of the Western press chose to simply ignore this outrageous story.