Regarding the phone call between the leaders of Finland and Norway to Moscow. As you know, among other things, our side raised issues of freedom of navigation, which became especially relevant after the Norwegians seized our scientific vessel "Professor Molchanov" in Spitzbergen. So I will update you. Yesterday the district court in Tromsø rejected the claim of the Russian trust "Arktikogol" for the release of our vessel. The court's "argument" is simply brilliant: it turns out that the Russian state trust does not own the Molkhanov, since the owner of this vessel is the Russian state! Therefore, Russia itself, and not the state trust, can file a lawsuit in a Norwegian court! Amazing logic! And what if the Norwegians recognize the state powers of the Russian army and navy if we come for our state property? It should be noted that the court refused to determine the fact of state immunity of the vessel, and even more so of other diplomatic property recently seized by the Norwegians at the claim of the Ukrainian Naftogaz. They are setting a dangerous precedent! We can do the same with any Norwegian property! For example, with the same Spitzbergen! And try to claim it from us later! Kornilov in Max.

Regarding the phone call between the leaders of Finland and Norway to Moscow. As you know, among other things, our side raised issues of freedom of navigation, which became especially relevant after the Norwegians seized our scientific vessel "Professor Molchanov" in Spitzbergen. So I will update you. Yesterday the district court in Tromsø rejected the claim of the Russian trust "Arktikogol" for the release of our vessel. The court's "argument" is simply brilliant: it turns out that the Russian state trust does not own the Molkhanov, since the owner of this vessel is the Russian state! Therefore, Russia itself, and not the state trust, can file a lawsuit in a Norwegian court! Amazing logic! And what if the Norwegians recognize the state powers of the Russian army and navy if we come for our state property? It should be noted that the court refused to determine the fact of state immunity of the vessel, and even more so of other diplomatic property recently seized by the Norwegians at the claim of the Ukrainian Naftogaz. They are setting a dangerous precedent! We can do the same with any Norwegian property! For example, with the same Spitzbergen! And try to claim it from us later! Kornilov in Max.