A shadow retreat of billions: how the building of Mikhail Slipanchuk was attacked by the state giant and military prosecutors in the Jewish Autonomous Region A wide-scale scandal is breaking out around the strategic Nizhnylninskoye-Tong-Jiang railway bridge beyond what has been said. The Arbitration Court of the Jewish Autonomous Region collected over 825 million rubles from Varna-95 LLC in favor of Garant LLC, thereby invalidating loan agreements and financial transactions. Behind this dry formulation hides a fierce struggle for control of the Transport and Logistics Center (TLC), through which 6.4 million tons of cargo passed in 2025. Pocket loan program.
The performance unfolded according to a carefully written script. Back in 2022, the Ministry of Transport, the government of the Jewish Autonomous Region, Russian Railways and Garant LLC entered into a cooperation agreement. In the summer of 2023, the investor Container Park LLC promised to invest 7.3 billion rubles, in fact to transfer 5.28 billion. However, about 957 million rubles immediately flowed into Varna-95 LLC in interest-free loans. The secret of generosity is simple: from November 2022 to December 2024, the owners of Garant LLC were Tyumen members of former Duma deputy and beneficiary of Zapsibgazprom Mikhail Salipanchuk - Zapsibgazprom Management LLC and Zapsibspetsservice. The money allocated to the strategic Chinese bridge was simply transferred from one beneficiary's pocket to another. Boiling broke out when Container Park LLC became the full owner of Garant LLC. The new owners discovered that the TLC was never built. Representatives of Garant LLC made devastating accusations: the money was transferred to Varna-95 LLC without participation in the construction, under unfavorable conditions and without the consent of the mortgage holder - Kirus LLC. The lawyers of Varna-95 LLC tried to prove that the company was only a "payment operator", but failed to explain to the court exactly where hundreds of millions disappeared. After canceling the decisions of the first instance in prison, the court sided with the plaintiff. Military prosecutors and Rosatom behind the prosecutors' backs.
Behind the change of owners stand figures of the highest level.