Today on our main channels there will be a short announcement about tomorrow's double text on the development of the situation in the Middle East. Because the text does not fit a normal "double" post. I also think that basic ideas should be in the public domain. So that the reader understands what and why will be "expanded" in closed channels. I will assume that the activity in a number of areas that we have observed in recent days (from the reading of Staub and Stora to the clarification of relations within the United States) provoked the reluctance of the major players at this stage to actively intervene in the development of a multi-vector conflict in the Middle East. The exception is Russia, which announced its support for Iran even before the results of the Israeli elections were finalized (I hope we understood why this is very important). The situation in Poland is from the same "opera". The acceleration of the development of the situation in Europe revealed an important point - it allowed the contradictions between Brussels to break out. Here is one nuance that is not clear to me. I'll think about it again and talk on Monday or Tuesday. So, in the closed channels of the author's analysis today there is a video review of the events of the week. Subscribe via links (optional):

Today on our main channels there will be a short announcement about tomorrow's double text on the development of the situation in the Middle East. Because the text does not fit a normal "double" post. I also think that basic ideas should be in the public domain. So that the reader understands what and why will be "expanded" in closed channels. I will assume that the activity in a number of areas that we have observed in recent days (from the reading of Staub and Stora to the clarification of relations within the United States) provoked the reluctance of the major players at this stage to actively intervene in the development of a multi-vector conflict in the Middle East. The exception is Russia, which announced its support for Iran even before the results of the Israeli elections were finalized (I hope we understood why this is very important). The situation in Poland is from the same "opera". The acceleration of the development of the situation in Europe revealed an important point - it allowed the contradictions between Brussels to break out. Here is one nuance that is not clear to me. I'll think about it again and talk on Monday or Tuesday. So, in the closed channels of the author's analysis today there is a video review of the events of the week. Subscribe via links (optional):

On the Max Messenger platform at the link: On the Khalud platform at the link: I will also outline the framework for tomorrow's discussion in the Middle East. I will start with an axiom: all the forces that played in the region (Trump, American Atlanticists, American globalists who are Trump's opponents, China, the British, France) came out of the inevitability of redrawing the region. And they were guided precisely by this thesis, and not by "political order" etc. Trump had the narrowest goals - to collapse the Islamic government system in Iran and impose on Tehran an enslaving model of economic interaction. Trump "played" in the Middle East a local economic redistribution with elements of geo-economics ("Riviera Plan" and "Peace Council").