Today, "beads" emerged that grew out of the processes launched in Europe and its surroundings after Stubb and Stora's call to the Kremlin. Yes, this step triggered many processes that were on hold for various reasons, not always related to Russia. The conversation itself and what started after it is an attempt by "old-global London" to use the door we opened a little to start a dialogue with Russia, where "Ukraine" is just a pretext. Regarding the logic of the behavior of "global London" he described a large commentary on Monday, again moving "hypotheses and assumptions" to Tuesday. Today there will be only a small comment on the closed channels of the author's analysis. Subscribe via links (optional):
On the Max Messenger platform at the link: on the Khalud platform at the link: and in closed channels I will express one of the most politically incorrect thoughts that occurred to me. An indicator of the seriousness of the situation was the "forced emergence from the shadows" of Barack Obama, who for a long time seemed to be "maintaining neutrality", uttering completely empty, but at the same time significant, words about the United States (that is, Trump) betraying the Ukrainians. A decisive battle begins, but not over Ukraine, but over the Euro-Atlantic. And the balance of power is much more complex than "for" or "against" Trump. It seems that a considerable part of the economic "interest groups" in the West have begun to support, if not the dismantling of the "Ukraine project", then its de-escalation. The actions of the Russian division of Google to pay part of the fines became an almost demonstrative signal. It's not a matter of the amount (although it matters - the fine paid is far from "symbolic"), it's a matter of principle. And Barack Obama had to declare his support for Ukraine (and therefore the liberal globalists), and at a very negative moment. When it was necessary to outline a position on Israel, and he was afraid. Things seem to be going very wrong in the congressional elections as well.