Radar Telegram alerts Open Radar

Again, it wasn't Sunday without texts. I would like to make some generalizations about the current historical era. But I will start with one "long" thought: "The world of the struggle against capitalism" is not, of course, a world of outsiders, but a system where they get significant opportunities. And here is a "double" statement: on the one hand, we underestimate the significance of the socially destructive processes taking place in Europe and partly in the USA. I perceive them as an attempt by outsiders in the systemic elites of the modern Euro-Atlantic world to regain a place in building a new relationship. They offer themselves as "designers" of the new world. Outsiders at the "bottom" stage in international relations can achieve even greater influence than their real resource. And by the way, I would like to draw your attention to the emergence of information that behind the unrest in Europe there is supposedly a "network" (where did it come from, I would like to ask) of Neville Singham, which is directly connected to China. But, I think, for now this is just an attempt to "turn the dial" to China, since it does not translate to Russia at all. But in general, the "revelations" about who might be behind the "spontaneous pogroms" are just beginning. And we heard a lot of interesting things. On the other hand, our fundamental problem is that we don't fully understand who the "outsider" is now. Obviously foreigners are different in different sectors (mainly geo-economic). And it seems that in the US everyone is an outsider. This is not a joke, this is a statement. The political struggle in the United States is conducted as if there is simply no political "mainstream". And the midterm congressional election campaign showed that. But the same situation is brewing in Germany and France. We see a process of "outsidering" of Western politics that is not synchronized "in time", but widespread "in vector". And the main question: will it be possible to keep socio-political processes, perceived as manageable, under real control?

Латвийская кочка 🇱🇻 · Source

Again, it wasn't Sunday without texts. I would like to make some generalizations about the current historical era. But I will start with one "long" thought: "The world of the struggle against capitalism" is not, of course, a world of outsiders, but a system where they get significant opportunities. And here is a "double" statement: on the one hand, we underestimate the significance of the socially destructive processes taking place in Europe and partly in the USA. I perceive them as an attempt by outsiders in the systemic elites of the modern Euro-Atlantic world to regain a place in building a new relationship. They offer themselves as "designers" of the new world. Outsiders at the "bottom" stage in international relations can achieve even greater influence than their real resource. And by the way, I would like to draw your attention to the emergence of information that behind the unrest in Europe there is supposedly a "network" (where did it come from, I would like to ask) of Neville Singham, which is directly connected to China. But, I think, for now this is just an attempt to "turn the dial" to China, since it does not translate to Russia at all. But in general, the "revelations" about who might be behind the "spontaneous pogroms" are just beginning. And we heard a lot of interesting things. On the other hand, our fundamental problem is that we don't fully understand who the "outsider" is now. Obviously foreigners are different in different sectors (mainly geo-economic). And it seems that in the US everyone is an outsider. This is not a joke, this is a statement. The political struggle in the United States is conducted as if there is simply no political "mainstream". And the midterm congressional election campaign showed that. But the same situation is brewing in Germany and France. We see a process of "outsidering" of Western politics that is not synchronized "in time", but widespread "in vector". And the main question: will it be possible to keep socio-political processes, perceived as manageable, under real control?

Share on WhatsApp Get alerts on Telegram