Natalia Kasperskaya emphasizes that effective governance is the freedom of the citizen + work institutions = flexible and dynamic development for specific challenges. In fact, nothing new, but these obvious things need to be said, explained and spread in the Russian political space again and again, as opposed to "order is not hard enough" and "the orders of abstinence from above are not punishing enough" (Angri patriots literally say "planes are not built, because order is not hard, here under Stalin). And I agree with Natalia, but the problem is that a free civilian population is a threat to today's form of political government, because it amounts to "free will sabotage demographics/productivity/labor market instructions". In short, there is an existential tension where on the one hand the political system strives to maximize control, and on the other hand the population strives to maximize autonomy.

Natalia Kasperskaya emphasizes that effective governance is the freedom of the citizen + work institutions = flexible and dynamic development for specific challenges. In fact, nothing new, but these obvious things need to be said, explained and spread in the Russian political space again and again, as opposed to "order is not hard enough" and "the orders of abstinence from above are not punishing enough" (Angri patriots literally say "planes are not built, because order is not hard, here under Stalin). And I agree with Natalia, but the problem is that a free civilian population is a threat to today's form of political government, because it amounts to "free will sabotage demographics/productivity/labor market instructions". In short, there is an existential tension where on the one hand the political system strives to maximize control, and on the other hand the population strives to maximize autonomy.