As for the types of economy, more broadly, the organization of the political system: raised by Michael Mann and Karl Wittfogel, it happened to Dakin that every organizational system (social or vertical networks do not play a role) has "a field of cost of accepted victims" - a physical collision (material of political and economic processes) between the aging system (or considered one new example of revolution, which may be a sudden change of revolution) And a new example of a new revolution of the Soviet Union. But the most important thing to consider here is the collision process itself, when the existing system bears costs and decides that such an amount and such type of resources (material, financial and human) can be lost in an attempt to keep the system stable. The decision to calculate the amount of possible loss price by the operators of the current system is always a situation, because the voltage is generated by a random route. And now, given this fact, we accept that if the events of the beginning of the 22nd year are "not according to plan", then all other decisions are "price of possible losses", which will never fit into the plans of the "normal" time period of the system, where every expenditure of resources is not provided by the calculation of "price of possible losses". In short, the resources invested as a result of "painful" conditions will never be invested in a peaceful environment, unless the conditions of peace are on the brink of an economic and political crisis, starting with a drastic change in the system itself (revolution, collapse, uncontrolled destruction).