The access of the agency's spies to Iran's nuclear centers is a masterpiece proposed by a chain newspaper! "Defending the NPT's survival does not mean endorsing all of the agency's positions." This is part of the latest editorial of the Arman network newspaper today. The expert mentioned in this note in his fantasy world is under the impression that Iran can solve all ideological and existential problems with the United States and Israel by joining the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty! and bring the people of Iran to prosperity after the removal of the brutal US sanctions. Such a world free from any kind of oppression, coercion and extravagance by arrogant people like America's terrorist president can only be found in the isolated minds of Iranian westerners. Because just when the treacherous enemy raised whispers about a nuclear attack on Iran and tries to normalize it in the world's public opinion, it is surprising why some people want to eliminate the only relative deterrent to this attack on Israel, so that Israel's soul will be comfortable in every respect for another crime against the Iranian people. This network communication expert presents Shazi's proposals in the following comment: "First, an official separation between issues: mandatory defense obligations, voluntary or supplementary arrangements, and demands that Iran see that they have no legal basis, with a written and agreed list. Second, start with the cheapest and least controversial action: reporting the condition of safety sites and assessing the damage of any safety materials, before handling nuclear material. Simultaneous negotiations with the agency and countries such as the US, China, Russia and the European Troika. Third, staged and limited access to websites in case of success in negotiations with the aforementioned countries and by following a specific safety protocol and protection of sensitive information. A naval blockade and embargo on oil exports, and a request from the Board of Governors to approve the ban on attacks on these facilities. Fifth, an accurate record of each agreement with measurable criteria, so that the subsequent dispute over the interpretation does not repeat itself.

The access of the agency's spies to Iran's nuclear centers is a masterpiece proposed by a chain newspaper! "Defending the NPT's survival does not mean endorsing all of the agency's positions." This is part of the latest editorial of the Arman network newspaper today. The expert mentioned in this note in his fantasy world is under the impression that Iran can solve all ideological and existential problems with the United States and Israel by joining the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty! and bring the people of Iran to prosperity after the removal of the brutal US sanctions. Such a world free from any kind of oppression, coercion and extravagance by arrogant people like America's terrorist president can only be found in the isolated minds of Iranian westerners. Because just when the treacherous enemy raised whispers about a nuclear attack on Iran and tries to normalize it in the world's public opinion, it is surprising why some people want to eliminate the only relative deterrent to this attack on Israel, so that Israel's soul will be comfortable in every respect for another crime against the Iranian people. This network communication expert presents Shazi's proposals in the following comment: "First, an official separation between issues: mandatory defense obligations, voluntary or supplementary arrangements, and demands that Iran see that they have no legal basis, with a written and agreed list. Second, start with the cheapest and least controversial action: reporting the condition of safety sites and assessing the damage of any safety materials, before handling nuclear material. Simultaneous negotiations with the agency and countries such as the US, China, Russia and the European Troika. Third, staged and limited access to websites in case of success in negotiations with the aforementioned countries and by following a specific safety protocol and protection of sensitive information. A naval blockade and embargo on oil exports, and a request from the Board of Governors to approve the ban on attacks on these facilities. Fifth, an accurate record of each agreement with measurable criteria, so that the subsequent dispute over the interpretation does not repeat itself.