"Mend" media reporter: Iran has acted in a calculated and methodical manner since the beginning of the war. The recent statements of Siavesh Ardalan, the senior correspondent of BBC Farsi, about how Iran is progressing in the war with Israel and the United States, as well as the statements of the spokesman of the Revolutionary Guards about new targets, including internet cables connecting Asia to Europe, led to an important discussion: Is Tehran playing a step-by-step game with the aim of influencing economic influence? The "Mend" media reporter continues and says: Iran has acted in a calculated and systematic manner since the beginning of the war; Both in the military aspect and in the economic aspect and put pressure on Israel. On the military level, Tehran's pattern of behavior in recent years has been based more on "tension management" and "staged reactions" than a full-scale war. On the economic level, the increasing attacks on oil tankers and the tension in the sea lanes can be seen as a means of pressure and a signal for the oil market. The approach of the American elections and the political developments in Israel increase the value of such signals for Tehran; Because any increase in oil prices can affect the electoral agenda and the political expenses of the American government. On the military front, many Western media have acknowledged that America's stockpile of ineffective interceptor missiles is running low and that America is unable to counter cheap and effective Iranian drones. Washington usually looks for a short-term, lightning-fast solution based on maximum pressure or limited actions; A model where quick results, immediate deterrence and changing the other party's behavior are the top priority. On the other hand, Tehran has invested in long-term resilience, in tolerance for sanctions and blockades, and in the ability to continue the pressure over a long period of time. This asymmetry in the "time horizon" is one of the reasons for the slowness and complexity of indirect negotiations. America wants to close the case in the short term and not give points to Iran, and since Iran has the upper hand in the field, it will certainly not be turned off by America's surpluses. Missile reserves and the ability to damage Israel's economic infrastructure is one of Israel's main fears. Tehran believes that it has the upper hand in the field of resilience, missile reserves and the ability to disrupt critical infrastructure.

"Mend" media reporter: Iran has acted in a calculated and methodical manner since the beginning of the war. The recent statements of Siavesh Ardalan, the senior correspondent of BBC Farsi, about how Iran is progressing in the war with Israel and the United States, as well as the statements of the spokesman of the Revolutionary Guards about new targets, including internet cables connecting Asia to Europe, led to an important discussion: Is Tehran playing a step-by-step game with the aim of influencing economic influence? The "Mend" media reporter continues and says: Iran has acted in a calculated and systematic manner since the beginning of the war; Both in the military aspect and in the economic aspect and put pressure on Israel. On the military level, Tehran's pattern of behavior in recent years has been based more on "tension management" and "staged reactions" than a full-scale war. On the economic level, the increasing attacks on oil tankers and the tension in the sea lanes can be seen as a means of pressure and a signal for the oil market. The approach of the American elections and the political developments in Israel increase the value of such signals for Tehran; Because any increase in oil prices can affect the electoral agenda and the political expenses of the American government. On the military front, many Western media have acknowledged that America's stockpile of ineffective interceptor missiles is running low and that America is unable to counter cheap and effective Iranian drones. Washington usually looks for a short-term, lightning-fast solution based on maximum pressure or limited actions; A model where quick results, immediate deterrence and changing the other party's behavior are the top priority. On the other hand, Tehran has invested in long-term resilience, in tolerance for sanctions and blockades, and in the ability to continue the pressure over a long period of time. This asymmetry in the "time horizon" is one of the reasons for the slowness and complexity of indirect negotiations. America wants to close the case in the short term and not give points to Iran, and since Iran has the upper hand in the field, it will certainly not be turned off by America's surpluses. Missile reserves and the ability to damage Israel's economic infrastructure is one of Israel's main fears. Tehran believes that it has the upper hand in the field of resilience, missile reserves and the ability to disrupt critical infrastructure.