The arrogance of Europe's JCPOA under the oil boot of $120 (2) 3- The increase in the price of energy, the growth of inflation, the pressure on energy-intensive industries and the contraction of the working and middle class have made the streets of Europe full of unions and political meetings, which we have seen explode in the streets of France and other European countries. The promise of "free security" under the NATO umbrella has translated into astronomical energy bills and production line shutdowns. This cumulative dissatisfaction caused politicians to need an "alternative issue"; And what subject is more appropriate than the "Iranian nuclear file" for media consumption and to divert attention from the internal incompetence of the European governments? How do the governments that failed the simple loyalty test for the promise (SPV and INSTEX) want to show themselves as reliable partners in larger tests? This question also arises in economic circles in Europe; When a European government cannot convince its banks to do legitimate and legal transactions with Iran, what "guarantee" is it talking about for dialogue with Iran? 4- Iran clearly said that the necessary condition for any dialogue is the practical realization of American and European commitments, and until this condition is realized, the nuclear issue will be off the agenda. The meaning of this statement is clear: first, actual removal of sanctions in practice; Second, providing a valid guarantee of non-repetition of unilateral withdrawal; Third, normalization of the banking and oil channels, and fourth, compensation for Iran's many years of damage and condemnation of the aggressors on Iranian soil in international forums. Without these things, any negotiation will be a repetition of the theater without success. The experience of 2018 and beyond has shown that any agreement that is "not guaranteed" is inherently unstable. Today, Iran clearly indicated the rules of the game. If the Europeans are really looking for energy security and regional stability, the way is through "implementing deferred commitments", not creating secondary agendas and wasting time! 5- The West's support for the war against Yemen not only created a human disaster, but also put world trade at chronic risk. Europe's return today to the "dialogue on Yemen with Iran" is a tacit admission of the failure of the war strategy.

The arrogance of Europe's JCPOA under the oil boot of $120 (2) 3- The increase in the price of energy, the growth of inflation, the pressure on energy-intensive industries and the contraction of the working and middle class have made the streets of Europe full of unions and political meetings, which we have seen explode in the streets of France and other European countries. The promise of "free security" under the NATO umbrella has translated into astronomical energy bills and production line shutdowns. This cumulative dissatisfaction caused politicians to need an "alternative issue"; And what subject is more appropriate than the "Iranian nuclear file" for media consumption and to divert attention from the internal incompetence of the European governments? How do the governments that failed the simple loyalty test for the promise (SPV and INSTEX) want to show themselves as reliable partners in larger tests? This question also arises in economic circles in Europe; When a European government cannot convince its banks to do legitimate and legal transactions with Iran, what "guarantee" is it talking about for dialogue with Iran? 4- Iran clearly said that the necessary condition for any dialogue is the practical realization of American and European commitments, and until this condition is realized, the nuclear issue will be off the agenda. The meaning of this statement is clear: first, actual removal of sanctions in practice; Second, providing a valid guarantee of non-repetition of unilateral withdrawal; Third, normalization of the banking and oil channels, and fourth, compensation for Iran's many years of damage and condemnation of the aggressors on Iranian soil in international forums. Without these things, any negotiation will be a repetition of the theater without success. The experience of 2018 and beyond has shown that any agreement that is "not guaranteed" is inherently unstable. Today, Iran clearly indicated the rules of the game. If the Europeans are really looking for energy security and regional stability, the way is through "implementing deferred commitments", not creating secondary agendas and wasting time! 5- The West's support for the war against Yemen not only created a human disaster, but also put world trade at chronic risk. Europe's return today to the "dialogue on Yemen with Iran" is a tacit admission of the failure of the war strategy.