By the way, except for jokes, Kataev writes everything about the case. Just do it in an expressive, f****** way. But really, comparing police violence in Russia and France is silly. It's not just because the police in France are harder at suppressing protests, no matter what Stanov says. Because the context is different. In Russia, people kicked bats and were jailed just for peaceful demonstrations, trying to go peacefully without violence. At the same time, there was no possibility of a legal protest, the authorities forbid demonstrations. The demonstrators themselves were usually as polite as possible, so as not to break the law, etc., and even when the police beat them, they usually did not react, with a few exceptions, such as Ben 21, when the cynical arrived. They used to shout "shame". Although there was less police violence than in France, it was unnecessary and unjustified. In France the situation is different. The police are here, they are good. But the protesters are not quiet. They are allowed to protest peacefully, no one spreads peaceful demonstrations. In addition, the protesters themselves attacked the police. There are suburbanites and anarchists who just think it is necessary to do this. I don't blame them, I understand their logic. I understand their worldview and why they do it. They attack the police themselves. They throw stones, hammer cocktails. Thundering cities, burning schools. It's really a different context. I don't understand how you can put the situation "the authorities prohibit any attempt at a peaceful protest and the police beat peaceful demonstrators" next to "the authorities allow peaceful demonstrations, protesters burn schools, beat, rob stores and attack police, and the police use special measures". Yes, it's different. If you think it's the same, you're an idiot.

By the way, except for jokes, Kataev writes everything about the case. Just do it in an expressive, f****** way. But really, comparing police violence in Russia and France is silly. It's not just because the police in France are harder at suppressing protests, no matter what Stanov says. Because the context is different. In Russia, people kicked bats and were jailed just for peaceful demonstrations, trying to go peacefully without violence. At the same time, there was no possibility of a legal protest, the authorities forbid demonstrations. The demonstrators themselves were usually as polite as possible, so as not to break the law, etc., and even when the police beat them, they usually did not react, with a few exceptions, such as Ben 21, when the cynical arrived. They used to shout "shame". Although there was less police violence than in France, it was unnecessary and unjustified. In France the situation is different. The police are here, they are good. But the protesters are not quiet. They are allowed to protest peacefully, no one spreads peaceful demonstrations. In addition, the protesters themselves attacked the police. There are suburbanites and anarchists who just think it is necessary to do this. I don't blame them, I understand their logic. I understand their worldview and why they do it. They attack the police themselves. They throw stones, hammer cocktails. Thundering cities, burning schools. It's really a different context. I don't understand how you can put the situation "the authorities prohibit any attempt at a peaceful protest and the police beat peaceful demonstrators" next to "the authorities allow peaceful demonstrations, protesters burn schools, beat, rob stores and attack police, and the police use special measures". Yes, it's different. If you think it's the same, you're an idiot.