New York Times: The continuation of the US military presence in the Middle East with the current structure no longer makes sense.
In an analytical comment, the "New York Times" emphasized that the continuation of the US military presence in the Middle East with the current structure no longer makes sense, and pointed to the widespread vulnerability of American military bases during the war with Iran and the growing skepticism of the Persian Gulf countries towards Washington's security commitments.
According to this newspaper, Iran's ability to precisely target American bases, the heavy costs of rebuilding damaged facilities and the efforts of regional countries to reduce their security dependence on Washington, made America face a strategic need: reducing the military presence, establishing smaller and more dispersed bases and accepting a reduction of influence in the region. The authors believe that the Iran War, despite its devastating consequences, provided an opportunity to redefine America's role and create a more independent security structure in the Middle East.
When the Iran war somehow ends, the United States will not be able to simply gather its forces and withdraw from the Middle East; Even if Tehran harms her more. Therefore, Washington should strive to rebuild its military presence. This action will likely include reducing forces and equipment, as well as accepting the fact that over time, the Persian Gulf states may see America as only one of several security partners.
Read the details of this report on Jamarn International Service.