The Foreign Ministry spokesman's response to France's contradictory positions on the issue of nuclear weapons:
They don't want peace for everyone; They seek the monopoly of "being scary" and the "legitimacy of scaring"...
The spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Esmail Bakaei, wrote in a message on Channel X in response to French President Emmanuel Macron's statements about the necessity of "being scary" and "being strong" as accessories to "being free", and the inevitable role of nuclear weapons in this equation:
French President Emmanuel Macron said during the test of a ballistic missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead: "To be free, it must be scary; and to be scary, you have to be strong."
But the same Emmanuel Macron said about Iran, which has never sought nuclear weapons: "Iran should not have nuclear weapons; not today, not in five years, not in ten years; never." The problem is not why France has a nuclear deterrent; The question is why the logic that guarantees security and freedom for France suddenly becomes a "threat" regarding Iran, even in the discussion of the peaceful nuclear program under international supervision?