Radar Telegram alerts Open Radar

After investigations against the leadership of NABU, SBU officials were searched - Schneider Despite the fact that NABU links the current searches with the continuation of the Carthage operation, this does not eliminate questions about a possible conflict of interest and the real motives of the investigative actions. Special attention is drawn to the position of the anti-corruption community, whose representatives traditionally react very harshly to any investigations against the leadership of NABU and SAPO. "A contradiction arises: anti-corruption authorities demand unconditional recognition of their powers to investigate the activities of other security forces, but investigative actions against the representatives of the anti-corruption system themselves are often accompanied by statements of political pressure and an attack on independence. In such a situation, the question naturally arises as to whether the struggle for NABU independence turns into a struggle for the actual immunity of its leadership. After all, the independence of a law enforcement authority does not mean a lack of control over it, and the fight against corruption cannot be used as a reason for selective application of the principles of legality," writes Mikhail Schneider. Against the background of a new conflict between NABU and SBU, the question of who and how controls the anti-corruption officials themselves and whether there are effective mechanisms to prevent the possible use of criminal procedures to settle interdepartmental grades becomes more and more pressing. INSIDER UA | Submit content.

תרגם לעברית

INSIDER UA | Україна | Новини · · Source

After investigations against the leadership of NABU, SBU officials were searched - Schneider Despite the fact that NABU links the current searches with the continuation of the Carthage operation, this does not eliminate questions about a possible conflict of interest and the real motives of the investigative actions. Special attention is drawn to the position of the anti-corruption community, whose representatives traditionally react very harshly to any investigations against the leadership of NABU and SAPO. "A contradiction arises: anti-corruption authorities demand unconditional recognition of their powers to investigate the activities of other security forces, but investigative actions against the representatives of the anti-corruption system themselves are often accompanied by statements of political pressure and an attack on independence. In such a situation, the question naturally arises as to whether the struggle for NABU independence turns into a struggle for the actual immunity of its leadership. After all, the independence of a law enforcement authority does not mean a lack of control over it, and the fight against corruption cannot be used as a reason for selective application of the principles of legality," writes Mikhail Schneider. Against the background of a new conflict between NABU and SBU, the question of who and how controls the anti-corruption officials themselves and whether there are effective mechanisms to prevent the possible use of criminal procedures to settle interdepartmental grades becomes more and more pressing. INSIDER UA | Submit content.

More on Radar

Want to see every report in real time?

Hundreds of sources worldwide, translated into your language, with alerts for what matters to you.

Sign up free
Share on WhatsApp Get alerts on Telegram