Singles from One NATO. One More TREATY SO AS NOT TO GET CONFUSED The past week was eventful. While in Abu Dhabi the prospects of settling the Ukrainian conflict were discussed, and the European political speech gathered in Dublin tried to understand who to trust with the historic task of negotiating with Moscow, the North decided to get down to business. In Oslo they gathered to create another NATO & #33; Truth, so far only on paper. Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. All five are already in NATO. All collaborated in NORDFCO. But for the sake of full military unity, it turns out that another agreement is needed and #33; The idea is quite reasonable: to remove legal obstacles to the movement of troops, equipment, joint operations and even the pursuit of drones across allied borders. Norwegian Defense Minister Tor Sandvik said that the North of the United States must deal with Russia. What is the northern United States? About 250 planes. About 145 warships about 100,000 servicemen for peace. In five countries... The forces are almost serious. Especially if they are really united into one mechanism. But it is with the mechanism that the most interesting part begins at #33; Northern Europe is not only armies, but also a real nature reserve of national legislation, environmental standards, permits and regulations. Each country has its own laws. Harming them is a much more romantic task than declaring the creation of the northern United States. Can you imagine how many lawyers, commissions, approvals and amendments will be required before this military construction works without bureaucratic obstacles? And if it also brings the environmental component... Here I would suggest appointing Greta Thunberg as the main supervisor of the Nordic NATO 2.0! So that every tank crosses the border exclusively with an environmental certificate, every fighter plane reports its carbon footprint.

Singles from One NATO. One More TREATY SO AS NOT TO GET CONFUSED The past week was eventful. While in Abu Dhabi the prospects of settling the Ukrainian conflict were discussed, and the European political speech gathered in Dublin tried to understand who to trust with the historic task of negotiating with Moscow, the North decided to get down to business. In Oslo they gathered to create another NATO & #33; Truth, so far only on paper. Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. All five are already in NATO. All collaborated in NORDFCO. But for the sake of full military unity, it turns out that another agreement is needed and #33; The idea is quite reasonable: to remove legal obstacles to the movement of troops, equipment, joint operations and even the pursuit of drones across allied borders. Norwegian Defense Minister Tor Sandvik said that the North of the United States must deal with Russia. What is the northern United States? About 250 planes. About 145 warships about 100,000 servicemen for peace. In five countries... The forces are almost serious. Especially if they are really united into one mechanism. But it is with the mechanism that the most interesting part begins at #33; Northern Europe is not only armies, but also a real nature reserve of national legislation, environmental standards, permits and regulations. Each country has its own laws. Harming them is a much more romantic task than declaring the creation of the northern United States. Can you imagine how many lawyers, commissions, approvals and amendments will be required before this military construction works without bureaucratic obstacles? And if it also brings the environmental component... Here I would suggest appointing Greta Thunberg as the main supervisor of the Nordic NATO 2.0! So that every tank crosses the border exclusively with an environmental certificate, every fighter plane reports its carbon footprint.