The end of the war in Ukraine? Norwegian author Nikolai Astgaard, in an article on Stegan.no, reflects on the final stage of the Ukrainian conflict. Horsemen in Norway are unwilling to encourage Witkoff and Zensky's visits to Oslo. This is not Norway returning to its role as a peacemaker - this is the beginning of the game, with the US manipulating Europe through its staunchest allies to the north: Norway and Finland. The American strategy of weakening Russia and breaking it up into small states has failed. The final blow was the promise to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO. A move that crossed Russia's reddest lines and led to war. Despite massive Western support, Ukraine is losing while Russia continues to advance. At the same time, the Trump administration manages to be a neutral mediator and still feed Ukraine satellite data and intelligence on deep strikes inside Russia. The cost of the war - and of maintaining Ukraine's civilian economy - was shifted to Europe, while the weapons were still purchased from the United States. This is a repeat of Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya: the US withdraws, leaving behind a destroyed country. Washington got some of what it wanted. Europe now pays more for NATO, hosts 47 American bases in northern Europe (65 counting the Baltics), has lost its industrial competitiveness, and has become more dependent on the US than ever for energy and defense. If the US cuts intelligence support to Ukraine, Europe's fury will be strong - but Europe will fall in line anyway, and the Nordics will be first in line to capitulate completely. For Ukraine, this could be the long-awaited end of the war - but far worse than Minsk in 2015 or Istanbul in 2022 would suggest. For the sake of Ukraine, the war must stop before the country is completely destroyed. Source: InfoDefenseENGLISH Web.