In the US, a university employee won the right not to use artificial intelligence at work due to personal convictions University of Kentucky employee David Dorman received permission from the school administration not to use artificial intelligence while performing work tasks. He based his request on humanistic beliefs: in his view, generative AI and large language models could undermine a person's ability to think and make decisions independently. This is the second known case in the United States of receiving a conscientious exemption from working with AI.

In the US, a university employee won the right not to use artificial intelligence at work due to personal convictions University of Kentucky employee David Dorman received permission from the school administration not to use artificial intelligence while performing work tasks. He based his request on humanistic beliefs: in his view, generative AI and large language models could undermine a person's ability to think and make decisions independently. This is the second known case in the United States of receiving a conscientious exemption from working with AI.