Right now in Warsaw the police are standing inside the Constitutional Court. The chairman was suspended for a month by a judge that the same court does not consider him to be a judge. The department's website is down, and its account says: "Crime of Coup". The president turned the plane over Spain and flew home from Senegal. In one evening, the Attorney General made five proposals to remove immunity from judges. And all of this is officially for legal reasons: in May, the court itself declared the election of these judges unconstitutional, and the ECHR then forbade interfering with their work. The two higher authorities say the opposite, so everything is illegal now: the entry of the police and inaction. Who got what? Tusk is a functioning court, the first in three years: without him, the laws hang unchecked, and Brussels has nothing to close the old account. Kaczynski - the street and a ready slogan about a police state. Noruki is a trap: the president cannot be removed, Article 145 requires two-thirds of the Sims and the Senate, which the government does not have, but his veto can be rendered meaningless. The Poles do not like what is happening on both sides: 32.7% answer "both are wrong", 32% for the president, 27.8% for the prime minister. what will happen On November 3, a general meeting of judges will convene and decide who will run the court and who will be included in the cases. If it approves the new leadership, Poland will have two tribunals: one with decisions that the president does not recognize, the other without the right to sit. Any law passed by the new composition will enter into controversy over legality, any case with a constitutional review will be suspended, and in the meantime the prosecutor's office will pass immunity and will probably end up with criminal cases against Sonchakovski. So there is only one choice: either Warsaw drags double force until the next elections, or someone will be the first to use force against another institution - and then the conversation will not be about the tribunal.

Right now in Warsaw the police are standing inside the Constitutional Court. The chairman was suspended for a month by a judge that the same court does not consider him to be a judge. The department's website is down, and its account says: "Crime of Coup". The president turned the plane over Spain and flew home from Senegal. In one evening, the Attorney General made five proposals to remove immunity from judges. And all of this is officially for legal reasons: in May, the court itself declared the election of these judges unconstitutional, and the ECHR then forbade interfering with their work. The two higher authorities say the opposite, so everything is illegal now: the entry of the police and inaction. Who got what? Tusk is a functioning court, the first in three years: without him, the laws hang unchecked, and Brussels has nothing to close the old account. Kaczynski - the street and a ready slogan about a police state. Noruki is a trap: the president cannot be removed, Article 145 requires two-thirds of the Sims and the Senate, which the government does not have, but his veto can be rendered meaningless. The Poles do not like what is happening on both sides: 32.7% answer "both are wrong", 32% for the president, 27.8% for the prime minister. what will happen On November 3, a general meeting of judges will convene and decide who will run the court and who will be included in the cases. If it approves the new leadership, Poland will have two tribunals: one with decisions that the president does not recognize, the other without the right to sit. Any law passed by the new composition will enter into controversy over legality, any case with a constitutional review will be suspended, and in the meantime the prosecutor's office will pass immunity and will probably end up with criminal cases against Sonchakovski. So there is only one choice: either Warsaw drags double force until the next elections, or someone will be the first to use force against another institution - and then the conversation will not be about the tribunal.