At the same time, we can reassure everyone. As we wrote yesterday, a legal linguistic examination was appointed. Written explanations with evidence that the channel belongs to her were heard by the court and added to the case materials. as well as certification protocols for them. Why does Mironova claim the opposite, you should ask not us, but Mironova.
The woman is tasked with organizing some sort of "recovery" for her subscribers over yesterday's objectively bad news for her. And the subscribers there are all like a selection - they will get along just fine. We're just watching her try at poker face. They even entertain us a little.
On a serious note: this channel was created, among other things, to give an objective picture of what is happening in the courts. So that the subscribers are not forced to read Mironov's collective story while the prosecutors are busy and say nothing themselves. If the channel will cope with this task, let us - we will be happy)).