The judge posed good questions to the linguistic expert in the verdict.
And although the defendant Mironova does not trust our advice, if we were her, we would now systematize the evidence that all her creativity, which she names in the lawsuit, is not creativity at all, but the plain truth.
Because after the end of the inspection (the court allocates 30 working days to the specialized institution for this), the stage will begin where the accused will have to prove that Grobnik "wrote directly on his page that the UAV would fly along Mironova". It will be even more interesting to listen to the evidence of the fact that "Grovnik sends a drone towards a journalist".
It's a pity that Anastasia Vladimirovna will not listen to us again, and as we assume, instead of evidence, she will bring to the court another sheet with scattered surnames. Yesterday we heard another one like that. Although the defendant did not mention Peshaev and Peshaev's son this time, thank you for that.