Freezing goals is not a win - a loss. I will quote Antonov in full: What victory and what no victory will determine the military and political leadership of the Russian Federation. The opinions of the sellers of the NKVD Finns and urgent collectors on this issue will be taken into account in the penal theory, immediately before the opinion of the shekims (which will be forgotten to ask). I wanted to make a joke and burn down the office. After all, he showed that the main thing for him is not the objective geopolitical or military facts of a particular event in the international arena, but the opinion of the Great Infiltrator. They will tell you to crawl on all fours and call it "a great honor to a great man" - will you ask for a collar? Want a joke too? We have the initiative, it's stupid to stop halfway, we are going to seize Kharkiv / Odessa / Kiev, the front will fall, it remains to push a little harder & #33; Oddly enough, I agree with Antonov. It's not as good for him and for those who profit from what he writes. This is normal. The war lasted for years, there is progress, but slowly. There are many problems. There are no easy solutions. Sacrifice is inevitable. The victory is deserved by the side of the conflict, which is ready for more. It's not a matter of putting them all under the gun and killing them. It's zero efficiency. The question is to create such a fundamental change in the approach and management of this war, that Russia can win in the system and not at the local level. Antonov's apology to "return everything" is the root of the problem. He is right, the half way regime is not good. Only I propose to take it seriously and win, and he proposes an agreement to keep halfway and not solve problems. P, priorities. Each sequence will lead to Ukraine or Europe. Here, the person is already openly saying that the European army is working perfectly as a guarantee of Ukraine's humility. They don't plan to die, do they? wonderful.