What do the supporters and opponents of Iran's nuclear doctrine say? Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine should be discussed on a national and historical level, and this discussion should not be partisan. Scientific discussion should not become taboo for researchers. The dilemma of logic in nuclear decision-making is that for every persuasive argument there is another unambiguous asymmetric argument. Here I try to discuss opposing horizons and perspectives on nuclear weapons, and I know how dangerous the misuse and misunderstanding of such discussions can be for thugs and mismanagement. In previous writings I have mentioned that with our emphasis on banning the production of nuclear weapons, we must now examine how effective this strategy has been. Has its political-military-propaganda effect not been eliminated?

What do the supporters and opponents of Iran's nuclear doctrine say? Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine should be discussed on a national and historical level, and this discussion should not be partisan. Scientific discussion should not become taboo for researchers. The dilemma of logic in nuclear decision-making is that for every persuasive argument there is another unambiguous asymmetric argument. Here I try to discuss opposing horizons and perspectives on nuclear weapons, and I know how dangerous the misuse and misunderstanding of such discussions can be for thugs and mismanagement. In previous writings I have mentioned that with our emphasis on banning the production of nuclear weapons, we must now examine how effective this strategy has been. Has its political-military-propaganda effect not been eliminated?