I just wanted to write that for the best of all, the last election wasn't a disaster after all - because the market reaction has arrived investors demand people - they need clarity. If there is a pursuit of AI (and common sense in general - in its primary meaning) - then capital will start looking for a convenient jurisdiction. If after all it's just a vote of no confidence in Trump personally, then everything will be back to normal. In the meantime, we have to go to the cache)) In general, based on a healthy consideration of all the facts, it is more likely that it is the latter. In a number of votes on other issues, the voters supported fairly conservative measures - for example, ID card voting was approved in several countries (mass immigration of immigrants will no longer wash out the results). And in general, the candidates - the doers of Trump's word - flew past them. Rubio chose the right moment to leave - the presidential race has begun, and the republic has options to make successful maneuvers. The same thing actually happened under Reagan - he was also elected in 1986 by two chambers of the Democrats - which did not prevent Bush from successfully exiting and continuing his way. In general, we don't understand, but partisanship in Chats is a strange phenomenon. It's always 50/50, two and a half, no matter what happens. The Democrats are no longer the party of the slave owners of the South, and the Republicans are no longer the party of Yankee towns. However, a balance is maintained. And that is the basic logic of the average person. Don't give someone too much power. Trump enjoys the image of the king - and received a natural answer. The new balance flows along the "growth vs. distribution" line. Private businesses versus public sector employees from all levels (including gender siad professors). Many people would like the second model, but the states have no more money for it, and there is nowhere to finance this layer of debt. In fact, today's signal from the stock market is a warning in the air: it smells like socialism, you can always "vote with your feet". It is clear that this is only a small percentage of the capital - but it is the most liquid and active, without it the economy would be very difficult. And in general everyone understands it.

I just wanted to write that for the best of all, the last election wasn't a disaster after all - because the market reaction has arrived investors demand people - they need clarity. If there is a pursuit of AI (and common sense in general - in its primary meaning) - then capital will start looking for a convenient jurisdiction. If after all it's just a vote of no confidence in Trump personally, then everything will be back to normal. In the meantime, we have to go to the cache)) In general, based on a healthy consideration of all the facts, it is more likely that it is the latter. In a number of votes on other issues, the voters supported fairly conservative measures - for example, ID card voting was approved in several countries (mass immigration of immigrants will no longer wash out the results). And in general, the candidates - the doers of Trump's word - flew past them. Rubio chose the right moment to leave - the presidential race has begun, and the republic has options to make successful maneuvers. The same thing actually happened under Reagan - he was also elected in 1986 by two chambers of the Democrats - which did not prevent Bush from successfully exiting and continuing his way. In general, we don't understand, but partisanship in Chats is a strange phenomenon. It's always 50/50, two and a half, no matter what happens. The Democrats are no longer the party of the slave owners of the South, and the Republicans are no longer the party of Yankee towns. However, a balance is maintained. And that is the basic logic of the average person. Don't give someone too much power. Trump enjoys the image of the king - and received a natural answer. The new balance flows along the "growth vs. distribution" line. Private businesses versus public sector employees from all levels (including gender siad professors). Many people would like the second model, but the states have no more money for it, and there is nowhere to finance this layer of debt. In fact, today's signal from the stock market is a warning in the air: it smells like socialism, you can always "vote with your feet". It is clear that this is only a small percentage of the capital - but it is the most liquid and active, without it the economy would be very difficult. And in general everyone understands it.